Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast cancer

BACKGROUND: Recent advances in diagnosis and treatment of cancer have led to an increase in cancer survival, and hence, there is a greater emphasis on quality beside quantity of survival. Developing countries too have begun to recognize the need for monitoring quality of life (QOL). However, in most of the developing countries, a validated and reliable tool for the purpose is yet to be realized. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The functional assessment of chronic illness therapy (FACIT) system is a collection of QOL questionnaires targeted to measure QOL in chronic illness. The functional assessment of cancer therapy for breast cancer (FACT-B) was translated into the local language (Malayalam) and tested for validity and reliability. RESULTS: The tool thus developed showed substantial sensitivity, as does the source tool. The Cronbach's alpha for the total FACT-B was 0.87, which is similar to the alpha of 0.9 observed in the FACT-B English version. The mean FACT-B score was 94.3 compared to 112.8 for the source tool. CONCLUSION: The Malayalam translation of the FACT-B questionnaire was developed, tested and validated, and was found satisfactory in comparison to the source tool.

We undertook to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Breast (FACT-B) scale into Korean and to evaluate its reliability and validity. The translation procedure followed the standard Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy translation methodology. A total of 201 breast cancer patients (mean age, 43.87 years) were studied for psychometric properties of the FACT-B scale. A pre-test of 20 Korean breast cancer patients indicated that the Korean FACT-B scale provided good content coverage and overall comprehensibility. Our results indicated high internal consistency of the FACT-B scale, with Cronbach's alpha coefficients ranging from 0.79 to 0.90. The only exception was the Breast Cancer Scale (BCS), which had a Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.67. We can consider that most of the patients in this study had not resumed sexual activity after surgery and found it difficult to comment on this aspect. We also considered that contents of the BCS may have been somewhat heterogeneous. After performing a factor analysis of the BCS data from this study, we identified three factors, accounting 58.8%: psychological distress (5 items, with explained variances of 27.5%), feminine satisfaction (2 items, with explained variances of 17.1%), and physical complaints (2 items, with explained variances of 14.2%). The FACT-B scale also demonstrated good convergent and divergent validity when correlated with the shortened forms of the Profile of Mood States and the Functional Living Index-Cancer (FLIC). We can now evaluate the Quality of Life (QoL) of Korean breast cancer patients using this reliable and valid instrument. Nevertheless our study has the limitation that it did not evaluate the sensitivity to the changes of the patients' QoL in the long term follow-up, and we will supplement it in our further study.

OBJECTIVES: There is a need in the United States for culture-equivalent assessment of health-related quality of life, particularly among people who speak different languages and among those with low literacy skills. This report summarizes the adaptation of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) Scales for use with Spanish-speaking cancer patients, including those with low literacy. METHODS: The Spanish language version of the general Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy scale plus five disease-specific subscales (breast, lung, colorectal, head and neck, HIV infection) were translated, reviewed, and revised, then evaluated in interviews with Spanish-speaking patients from the mainland United States and Puerto Rico. An iterative forward-backward-forward sequence of item translation, expert bilingual/bicultural advisor review, pretesting interviews with 92 patients, and further expert advisory input were used to establish semantic, content, and partial technical equivalence. RESULTS: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and five disease-specific subscales were translated successfully into wording that was easily understood and answered, leading to psychometric and scoring data similar to that of the English version. All but one of the 28 Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General items and all of the disease-specific items were seen as culturally relevant. The result is a document that underwent iterative forward-backward translation and evaluation and was pretested successfully with native Spanish-speaking oncology patients living in the Central United States and Puerto Rico. CONCLUSIONS: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and five disease-specific subscales have been translated successfully into Spanish using a thorough translation and initial validation methodology. The methods and data provide a model for preparing a health status questionnaire for cross-cultural validation. The questionnaire is available for use in clinical trials and clinical practice.